Right vs. Wrong: Alamosa prosecutor knows the difference
Colorado,Uncategorized
Alamosa Prosecutor Dan McIntyre wants us to believe that if John Caudle killed his mother and step father it was over a dispute about chores. That would tie things up nicely. Never mind that the child he wants to try as an adult spent 14 years enduring severe neglect and abuse.
According to a recent interview with family friend Cecile Dinsmore in The Valley Courier, Caudle’s mother Joanne Rinebarger was an abusive drug addict who “killed every bit of joy in [John's] life, and took everything that he loved away from him as punishment.”
…But never mind all that because what is really on trial in the case of the State of Colorado vs. John Caudle is really justice vs. politics; right vs. wrong. McIntyre is seeking two consecutive 40 year sentences. Unless he expects Caudle to live to be 95 in prison, that’s a slow death sentence. McIntyre needs us to believe that he’s trying a “monster” because that is the only thing that justifies the monstrous vengeance he’s seeking.
More than anything, McInTyre needs us to believe that monstrous vengeance is justified. If we don’t believe that vengeance is necessary then he can’t justify it to himself. Like most prosecutors, McIntyre knows that kids are different from adults. He knows there are numerous studies (see references) that show kids are prone to risky, emotionally driven behavior. McIntyre knows that adolescents, while maturing, are not mature enough to make adult decisions in the heat of the moment.
Finally, McIntyre knows that using the practice of direct file to mete out cruel and unusual punishment to John Caudle is unconscionable. If John Caudle killed his mother and his step father then he ought to be incarcerated, but he shouldn’t be warehoused in cold storage for the rest of his life. As a child, Caudle deserves a chance at redemption.
Trying Caudle as an adult using direct file is wrong. McIntyre knows the difference between right and wrong; he just doesn’t care.
In the end, everything that Dan McIntyre knows makes him more of a monster than John Caudle will ever be.
Loading ...
Willfully sending an abused child to an adult prison is sicker than anything I can think of. The DA needs to consider the whole story, and not just the part that fits his rather warped theory of right and wrong.
John Caudle should be tried as a child, not an adult, and with great lieniency. It is a perversion of justice to further victimize a poor kid who never had a chance.
When it is “someone else’s child”, then prosecutors like McIntyre have no mercy, but you can bet that if it was his own child, he would feel differently.
This boy should be shown mercy, be rehabitilated and given a chance to heal, and have a chance at life that both his parents and the prosecutor are trying to rob him of. He has suffered enough; help him heal and return to society a productive citizen, not warehoused in our prison system.